Cases 31 - 40 of 365
Public School Teachers' Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv09319
Defendant:
ICAP Capital Markets LLC., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Public School Teachers' Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago and Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Tera Group, Inc. et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv02858
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tera Group, Inc, Tera Advanced Technologies, LLC, TeraExchange, LLC and others
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
IN RE: ICE LIBOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2019cv00439
Defendant:
Lloyds Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc., BNP Paribas SA and others
Plaintiff:
Putnam Bank
Consolidated Plaintiff:
City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System, City of Livonia Retiree Health and Disability Benefits Plan, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Training Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Abromavage v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
as 21-668
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark Hantho, in his official and individual capacities, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc and Jeffrey Bunzel, in his official and individual capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Neil Abromavage
Canyon Capital Advisors LLC et al v. Terraform Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09171
Plaintiff:
Canyon Capital Advisors LLC, ERISA Plaintiffs, Canyon Value Realization Fund LP and others
Defendant:
Terraform Global, Inc, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pr Petition for Removal
Kearny Investors S.A.R.L. et al v. Goldman Sachs & Co. et al
as 1:2016cv09566
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs & Co, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs & Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Kearny Investors S.A.R.L, ERISA Plaintiffs, Powell Investors II Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pr Petition for Removal
Canyon Capital Advisors LLC et al v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2016cv09172
Plaintiff:
Canyon Capital Advisors LLC, Permal Canyon IO Ltd. and EP Canyon Ltd.
Defendant:
Alvarez, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs & Co. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
ERISA Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pr Petition for Removal
Yaroni v. Pintec Technology Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2020cv08062
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Pintec Technology Holdings Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Allon Yaroni
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
IN RE: ICE LIBOR ANTITRUST LIT
as 20-1492
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Livonia Retiree Health amd Disability Benefits Plan, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Annuity Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc., MUFG Bank, Ltd., The Norinchukin Bank and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute
In Re: SSA Bonds Antitrust Lit
as 20-1759
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-100, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Barclays Services Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Northern California, Irving Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund, City of Riviera Beach Police Officers' Pension Fund, on behalf of itself and all otrhers similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation, Alaska Department of Revenue, Treasury Division and Iron Workers Pension Plan of Western Pennsylvania, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Deutsche Bank AG, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
