Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Phillips v. Abbott et al
as 2:2021cv00089
Plaintiff:
Matthew Phillips
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Dade Phelan, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. McDaniel et al ***TRANSFERRED TO TYLER DIVISION.***
as 1:2020cv00028
Defendant:
John McDaniel, Kimberly Dew, Sherry King and others
Plaintiff:
Robert H Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKelvey v. England et al
as 6:2019cv00515
Plaintiff:
Clarence McKelvey
Defendant:
Mailroom Sup. Sherry King, Warden Audrey England, Mailroom Kimberly Dew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. McDaniel et al
as 6:2019cv00491
Defendant:
John McDaniel, Kimberly Dew, Sherry King and others
Plaintiff:
Robert H Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. McDaniel et al
as 1:2019cv00514
Defendant:
John McDaniel, Kimberly Dew, Sherry King and others
Plaintiff:
Robert H Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Vega et al
as 1:2019cv00275
Defendant:
Kimberly Dew, Lorenzo Bustos, Frank Leonard and others
Plaintiff:
Robert H Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dews v. Aetna Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
Angela Dews
Defendant:
Aetna Inc, Michael Hardaway and U.S. Pain and Spine Institute, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dew v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2017cv01128
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dew
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and DOES 1-10 inclusive
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dew v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00063
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dew
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and DOES 1-10 inclusive
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
