Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Milkmen Design, LLC v. DGL Group Ltd. et al
as 5:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Milkmen Design, LLC
Defendant:
DGL Group Ltd., Five Below, Inc. and 1616 Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Unicorn Global, Inc. et al v. DGL Group, Ltd.
as 1:2021cv01443
Plaintiff:
Unicorn Global, Inc. and Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
DGL Group, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
RAZOR USA LLC et al v. DGL GROUP, LTD.
as 2:2019cv12939
Defendant:
DGL GROUP, LTD.
Plaintiff:
RAZOR USA LLC and SHANE CHEN
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
VOICE CONTROL VEHICLES, LLC v. AWW INDUSTRIES LLC et al
as 2:2019cv03397
Defendant:
DGL GROUP LTD. and AWW INDUSTRIES LLC
Plaintiff:
VOICE CONTROL VEHICLES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
DODOcase, Inc. v. DGL Group LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01188
Plaintiff:
DODOcase, Inc.
Defendant:
DGL Group Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Great American Duck Races Incorporated v. DGL Group LTD
as 2:2017cv00763
Plaintiff:
Great American Duck Races Incorporated
Defendant:
DGL Group LTD
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Battery On The Go, Inc. v. DGL Group Ltd. et al
as 1:2015cv05010
Plaintiff:
Battery On The Go, Inc.
Defendant:
DGL Group Ltd. and Ezra Zaafarani
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
LEADING EDGE NOVELTY, INC. et al v. BED, BATH & BEYOND, INC. et al
as 9:2014cv81447
Plaintiff:
Leading Edge Novelty, Inc. and Tsan-Yao Chen
Defendant:
BED, BATH & BEYOND, INC. and DGL GROUP, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
DGL GROUP, LTD. v. WARNER
as 2:2014cv05932
Plaintiff:
DGL GROUP, LTD.
Defendant:
ANDREW WARNER
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Cloud B, Inc. v. DGL Group Ltd. et al
as 1:2014cv02863
Plaintiff:
Cloud B, Inc.
Defendant:
DGL Group Ltd. and Ezra Zaafarani
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
