Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00675
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv06391
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv03734
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208
E.D. v. SHARKEY et al
as 5:2016cv02750
Plaintiff:
E.D.
Defendant:
DANIEL SHARKEY, BERKS COUNTY RESIDENTIAL CENTER-IMMIGRATION FAMILY CENTER (BCRC-IFC), COUNTY OF BERKS, PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01935
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00964
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CEBALLOS-QUINTANILLA et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ("DHS") et al
as 5:2016cv00118
Petitioner:
FANY YAKELIN CEBALLOS-QUINTANILLA and L.Y.T.C.
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ("DHS"), U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION ("CBP"), U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ("USCIS") and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00069
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
