Cases 1 - 10 of 11
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2023cv17721
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adrian GuilleIn re: Adrian Guille
as 21-2842
Petitioner:
In re: ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, RAYMOND ROYCE, SEARS and others
Respondent:
DAVID RICHARDS, AMY EMRICH, S. PATTERSON and others
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2021cv17348
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian Guille v. Steven Johnson, et al
as 21-1515
Defendant:
OFFICER BAILEY, OFFICER MCLINCH, SEARS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID RICHARDS
Adrian Guille v. Steven Johnson, et al
as 19-2430
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER PARKER, MRS. ADAMS, OFFICER K. FINN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN GUILLE
DIBENEDETTI v. HAMILTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 3:2015cv05494
Plaintiff:
ROSE M. DIBENEDETTI
Defendant:
HAMILTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Ralph Baker v. Melanie Ford, et al
as 13-4477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MELANIE FORD, CLASIFICATION (N.J. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS), MELANIE BURAK, LAW LIBRARY, (EDUCATION DEPT) N.J. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, LT. MCCLAIN, WEST COMPOUND N.J. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and others
WELLS v. NELSON et al
as 3:2013cv06024
Plaintiff:
TAHAIJ WELLS
Defendant:
KENNETH NELSON, JIMMY BARNES, VICTOR SIERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. FORD et al
as 3:2013cv02920
Plaintiff:
RALPH BAKER
Defendant:
MELANIE FORD, MELANIE BURAK, MCCLAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIBENEDETTIS et al v. A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES, INC. et al
as PAE/2:09-CV-72613
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES, INC
Plaintiff:
DIBENEDETTIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
