Civil Rights Cases filed in Massachusetts
Dickey v. City of Boston et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv11190
Plaintiff: James Dickey
Defendant: City of Boston, Edward Coburn, Maria Theophilis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
City of Boston Inspectional Services Department v. Dickey et al
as 1:2018cv10143
Plaintiff: City of Boston Inspectional Services Department
Defendant: James Dickey and East Fourth Street LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Boston et al v. Dickey et al
as 1:2017cv10791
Plaintiff: City of Boston and Inspectional Services Department
Defendant: James S. Dickey and East Fourth Street, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dickey v. Inspectional Services, Department of the City of Boston
as 1:2017cv10754
Plaintiff: James Dickey
Defendant: Inspectional Services, Department City of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickey et al v. Laverty et al
as 1:2011cv11733
Plaintiff: Zelma Dickey and John Dickey
Defendant: Mark Laverty and Law Offices of Russo & Scolnick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickey et al v. Adams et al
as 1:2011cv11737
Plaintiff: Zelma Dickey and John Dickey
Defendant: Marjorie Adams and Adams & Sammon Law
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickey et al v. Stearns et al
as 1:2011cv11731
Plaintiff: Zelma Dickey and John Dickey
Defendant: Richard G. Stearns and U.S.District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickey et al v. Southeast Housing Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2011cv11726
Plaintiff: Zelma Dickey and John Dickey
Defendant: Southeast Housing Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Anne Kenney Chaplin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickey v. Inspectional Services Department of the City of Boston
as 1:2008cv11569
Plaintiff: James Dickey
Defendant: Inspectional Services Department of the City of Boston
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?