Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01694
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BMW of North America, LLC et al v. Sprinter Supplier, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv03750
Defendant:
Dmitry Poteryahin, DIP Trading US, Ltd., Does 1-10, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
BMW of North America, LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Ki Ho Yang et al v. Plasti Dip International, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09999
Defendant:
The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California, The Sherwin-Williams Manufacturing Company, Plasti Dip International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ki Ho Yang, Ko Eun Oh and Keith Yang
Cross Defendant:
Valspar Specialty Paints, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Levi Strauss & Co. v. Rip N Dip, Inc.
as 4:2018cv05976
Defendant:
Rip N Dip, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Levi Strauss & Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Preci Dip SA v. Tri Star Electronics International, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv05052
Defendant:
Carlisle Interconnect Technologies, Inc., DOES and Tri-Star Electronics International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Preci-Dip SA
Armagost v. Double Dip LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01669
Plaintiff:
Steven Armagost
Defendant:
Double Dip LLC, Deborah Snow-Squadere and Unknown Squadere
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plasti Dip International, Inc. v. Stonebarger et al
as 2:2015cv01358
Plaintiff:
Plasti Dip International, Inc.
Defendant:
Derek Stonebarger and Vegaswood Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01844
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
