Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dipesh Singla v. NLRB
as 26-2788
Petitioner:
DIPESH SINGLA
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Dipesh Singla v. University of Chicago
as 26-2509
Plaintiff:
DIPESH SINGLA
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
Dipesh v. The Univeristy of Chicago
as 1:2026cv06156
Petitioner:
Dipesh Singla
Respondent:
Chicago The University of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Singla v. The University of Chicago
as 3:2026cv03174
Plaintiff:
Dipesh Singla
Defendant:
The University of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Singla v. United States of America et al
as 4:2026cv04102
Defendant:
The Legal Services Corporation, The American Bar Association, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Dipesh Singla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dipesh Singla v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2025cv10660
Plaintiff:
Dipesh Singla
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Linkedin Corporation, Workday Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Singla v. United States of America et al
as 1:2025cv12810
Plaintiff:
Dipesh Singla
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Illinois, Office of Civil Rights Department of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Singla v. United States of America et al
as 1:2025cv01431
Plaintiff:
Dipesh Singla
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Illinois, Chicago Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Singla v. United States of America et al
as 1:2025cv01426
Plaintiff:
Dipesh Singla
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Illinois, Office of Civil Rights Department of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv08098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
