Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Durwin Bonds, Jr. v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6151
Plaintiff:
DURWIN EVANT BONDS, JR.
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director VA Dept. of Corrections, RICK WHITE, Warden of Red Onion State Prison, K. ALMARADE, Food Service ROSP and others
Richard Williams v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6537
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD LEE WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director VA Dept. of Corrections
Sparrow v. Director, VA Dept. of Corrections
as 3:2015cv00220
Petitioner:
Dale L. Sparrow
Respondent:
Director, VA Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
v. Bell et al
as 2:2014cv00640
Petitioner:
Mahtorhee L. Bell, III
Respondent:
Director, VA Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smart v. Director, Va. Dept. of Corrections
as 2:2014cv00045
Petitioner:
David Michael Smart
Respondent:
Director, Va. Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Strebe v. Director, VA Dept. Of Corrections
as 1:2013cv00494
Plaintiff:
Brian David Strebe
Respondent:
Director, VA Dept Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maceo Spates v. Harold Clarke
as 13-6358
Petitioner - Appellee:
MACEO SPATES
Respondent - Appellant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VA Dept. of Corrections
Franklin v. Director, VA Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2013cv00265
Petitioner:
Paul D. Franklin
Respondent:
Director, VA Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nottingham v. VA Dept. of Corrections
as 2:2012cv00067
Petitioner:
Antalf Nottingham
Respondent:
Director, VA Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haga v. Director, Va. Dept. of Corrections
as 7:2012cv00023
Respondent:
Director, Va. Dept. of Corrections
Petitioner:
Ralph E. Haga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
