Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv20875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv20271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv24798
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Goldberg et al v. McAleenann et al
as 1:2019cv24753
Plaintiff:
Rafael Ramon Aragones Pardo, Linh Thi Thuy Pham, Michael I. Goldberg and others
Defendant:
Kevin McAleenann, Kenneth T (Ken) Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv24590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Tran v. Acting Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
as 1:2019cv24023
Plaintiff:
Tin P. Tran
Defendant:
Acting Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv21974
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv21565
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ledovskaya et al v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv10046
Plaintiff:
Anastasia Andreyevna Ledovskaya and Ivan Aleksandrovich Antropov
Defendant:
DISTRICT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT 9, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv80345
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
