Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-12013
Intervenor - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
-JO Jacob Friedman, Estelle Sapir and Miriam Stern, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Union Bank of Switzerland, et al. (See Doc. No. 897)
as 1:1996cv04849
:
, , and others
Defendant:
Bank of Internationa, Banking Institutions # 1 - 100, Certain Swiss Bank Accounts described as follows: All accounts and funds maintained at Credit Suisse, or any other financial institutions in Switzerland held in the name or for the benefit of and others
Interested Party:
Michael Bradfield, Claims Resolution Tribunal, Judith Cole and others
Movant:
Susan E. Brune, Director of International Affairs and Representative to the United Nations of Agudath Israel World Organization, Disability Rights Advocates and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Friedman and Gizella Weisshaus
In Re:
Holocaust Victim Assets
Claimant:
Josef Kohn
See Doc. No. 897:
Estelle Sapir and Miriam Stern
Intervenor Plaintiff:
South Florida Holocaust Survivors Coalition, The World Jewish Restitution Organization and M.D. Thomas Weiss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Maurizio Antoninetti v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
as 08-55946
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MAURIZIO ANTONINETTI
Defendant - Appellant:
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION AND DEFENSE FUND, DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES, DISABILITY RIGHTS CALIFORNIA and others
Maurizio Antoninetti v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
as 08-55867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURIZIO ANTONINETTI
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION AND DEFENSE FUND, DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES, DISABILITY RIGHTS CALIFORNIA and others
State of Arizona, et al v. Harkins Amusement Enterprises,, et al
as 08-16075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. Terry Goddard, the Attorney General and CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LAW
Defendant - Appellee:
HARKINS AMUSEMENT ENTERPRISES, INC., HARKINS ENTERPRISES, INC., HARKINS CAMEL VIEW THEATRES, INC. and others
Petitioner-intervenor - Appellant:
FREDERICK LINDSTROM
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellant:
LARRY WANGER
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL DISABILITY RIGHTS NETWORK, ALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL ASSOCIATION FOR THE DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING, A.G. Bell, AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE BLIND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv01785
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Hollonbeck, et al v. United States Olympic Com., et al
as 07-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOT HOLLONBECK, JOSE ANTONIO INIGUEZ and JACOB WALTER JUNG HO HEILVEIL
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
VIE SPORTS MARKETING, INC., a Georgia corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE, a federally-chartered coporation
Amicus Curiae:
DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION AND DEFENSE FUND, DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND and others
Lonberg, et al v. City of Riverside
as 06-55781
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN LONBERG, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF RIVERSIDE, a municipal corporation
Amicus Curiae:
CIVIL JUSTICE ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA, THE CALIFORNIA COUNCIL OF THE BLIND, CALIFORNIANS FOR DISABILITY RIGHTS and others
Garcia, et al v. Brockway, et al
as 05-35647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NOLL GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS BROCKWAY, ROBERT D. STEWART, Jr. and STEWART MILES & ASSOCIATES
Defendant:
J. J. ZAVOSHY, Y. W. ZAVOSHY, H&H PROPERTIES and others
Amicus Curiae:
IDAHO ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, SILVER STATE FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL, INC., NEVADA DISABILITY ADVOCACY AND LAW CENTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
