Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ballard v. Kittrell et al
as 5:2022hc02110
Petitioner:
Robert S. Ballard
Respondent:
Sgt. V. Kittrell, Officer T. Smith, Officer Fina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2021ct03304
Plaintiff:
Larry Brandon Moore
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant, State of North Carolina, NC Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henslee v. Stoppell et al
as 5:2019ct03369
Defendant:
Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Sgt. Mansphit, Sgt. Stoppell and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Henslee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Bennett et al
as 5:2019ct03299
Defendant:
S. Collier, Shirley Bennett, Disciplinary Hearing Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Adams et al
as 5:2018ct03026
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Murray
Defendant:
Major Adams and Disciplinary Hearing Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortez v. Medical Administrator at Central Prison et al
as 5:2015ct03251
Plaintiff:
Antonio Medramo Ortez
Defendant:
Medical Administrator at Central Prison, Medical Administrator at Harnett Prison, Medical Administrator at Caledonia Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lester v. Disciplinary Hearing Officer
as 5:2011hc02189
Petitioner:
Denny Lester
Respondent:
Disciplinary Hearing Officer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Butler v. Revell et al
as 5:2011hc02158
Petitioner:
Wilbur Butler
Respondent:
Sara Revell and Disciplinary Hearing Officer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lawrence v. Discliplinary Hearing Officer et al
as 5:2011hc02151
Petitioner:
Krafterfer Jay Lawrence
Respondent:
Disciplinary Hearing Officer and Sarah Revell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holloway v. Disciplinary Hearing Officers et al
as 5:2011hc02139
Petitioner:
Victor Holloway
Respondent:
Disciplinary Hearing Officers and Sarah Revell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
