Cases 1 - 10 of 75
James Pepper v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1261
Plaintiff:
JAMES PEPPER
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
Santos Mota v. Warden Indiana County Jail, et al
as 24-1205
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
WARDEN INDIANA COUNTY JAIL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Andrew Cairns v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 23-2900
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW CAIRNS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Qudre McMillan v. Superintendent Chester SCI, et al
as 23-2253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUDRE MCMILLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT CHESTER SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
Otto Paxton v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 23-1199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OTTO PAXTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
Qudre McMillan v. Superintendent Chester SCI, et al
as 22-2809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUDRE MCMILLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT CHESTER SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
Breon Powell v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 22-2681
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BREON POWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
John PassmoreIn re: John Passmore
as 22-1598
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN PASSMORE
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
Gregory Dunbar v. District Attorney Bucks CountyIn re: Gregory Dunbar v. District Attorney Bucks County
as 22-1573
Petitioner:
In re: GREGORY DUNBAR
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
In re: John Passmore
as 22-1340
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN PASSMORE
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
