Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HUSOK v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2021cv00092
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK CAPOZZA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD HUSOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RANKIN v. TICE et al
as 2:2018cv01670
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
LARRY KERMIT RANKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRYANT v. WARDEN, SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2018cv01671
Petitioner:
JULIAN BRYANT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA and WARDEN, SCI FAYETTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. CLARK et al
as 2:2018cv01661
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CLARK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
GREGORY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frederick Banks v. CIA, et al
as 16-5119
Petitioner - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Respondent - Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. and others
WAGNER v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2011cv00762
Plaintiff:
LEE H. WAGNER
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PROSDOCIMO v. BEARD et al
as 2:2009cv01028
Petitioner:
WILLIAM PROSDOCIMO
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, PH.D., DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PROSDOCIMO v. BEARD et al
as 2:2008cv01500
Petitioner:
WILLIAM PROSDOCIMO
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
