Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BRENNER v. OVERMEYER et al
as 3:2022cv00157
Petitioner:
Ian Brenner
Respondent:
Michael Overmeyer, Josh Shapiro and District Attorney of York County, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRENNER v. OVERMEYER et al
as 1:2021cv00335
Petitioner:
IAN BRENNER
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMEYER, JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF YORK COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRADLEY v. CLARK et al
as 3:2017cv01683
Petitioner:
Tracy R Bradley
Respondent:
Michael Clark, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE/COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and District Attorney of York County, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRADLEY v. CLARK et al
as 1:2017cv00196
Petitioner:
TRACY R. BRADLEY
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE/COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF YORK COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Okey v. Commonwealth of Pennyslvania et al
as 1:2014cv00616
Petitioner:
Patrick Okey
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennyslvania and PA Attorney General
Miscellaneous_party:
District Attorney of York County, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sims v. Beard et al
as 3:2011cv00004
Petitioner:
David Scott Sims
Respondent:
Jeffrey A Beard, PA State Attorney General and District Attorney of York County, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cramer v. Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon et al
as 1:2007cv00496
Petitioner:
Derrick Cramer
Respondent:
Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon, Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon, District Attorney For York County Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quaster v. Vincent et al
as 3:2007cv00414
Petitioner:
Kenneth Craig Quaster
Respondent:
Mardi I. Vincent, District Attorney of York County, Pennsylvania and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
