Cases 11 - 18 of 18
HENDERSON v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2012cv04265
Petitioner:
DIONNE HENDERSON
Respondent:
JOHN P. DELANEY, PAMELA P. DEMBE, GEORGE E. BRINKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HENDERSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv01781
Petitioner:
DIONNE HENDERSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA, PAMELA P. DEMBE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PRATER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv07893
Petitioner:
WAYNE PRATER
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS-PHILADELPHIA, PAMELA PRYOR DEMBE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BUTLER v. DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv07891
Plaintiff:
CALVIN BUTLER
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRINSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv07479
Plaintiff:
CURTIS BRINSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and JACK MCMAHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2010cv00498
Plaintiff:
DAMEEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAINEY v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA (RESPONDENTS), ET AL.
as 2:2009cv02537
Petitioner:
KYLE RAINEY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA (RESPONDENTS), ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ABBOTT v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2007cv02447
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ABBOTT
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, SYLVESTER JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
