Cases 51 - 60 of 195
City & County of Honolulu v. Sunoco LP, et al
as 21-15313
Defendant / Appellant:
MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP., BP AMERICA, INC., CHEVRON USA INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY & COUNTY OF HONOLULU
Defendant:
DOES, 1 through 100 inclusive
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RICHARD BOWMAN MYERS, United States Air Force General (Retired), MICHAEL GLENN MULLEN, United States Navy Admiral (Retired) and others
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Allergan, Inc., et al
as 21-80005
Respondent:
STATE OF HAWAII, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF IOWA and others
Petitioner:
ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, ALLERGAN USA, INC., ALLERGAN, INC. and others
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
David Wit, et al v. United Behavioral Health
as 20-17363
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATASHA WIT, BRANDT PFEIFER, on behalf of the Estate of his deceased wife, Lauralee Pfeifer, CORINNA KLEIN and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
MARY JONES and LINDA TILLITT
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS (AHIP), NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF OPIOID DEPENDENCE, CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, FEDERATION OF AMERICAN HOSPITALS, NATIONA, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Richard Mark, et al v. Shamir USA, Inc., et al
as 20-56280
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAMIR USA, INC., SHAMIR OPTICAL INDUSTRY, LTD., SHAMIR OPTICA HOLDINGS A.C.S. LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MARK, Relator; ex rel United States of America
State of New York, et al v. Andrew Wheeler
as 20-73276
Petitioner:
STATE OF MAINE, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF HAWAII and others
Respondent:
ANDREW WHEELER, as Adminsitrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Environmental Protection Agency
State of California, et al v. USHHS, et al
as 20-16802
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SEEMA VERMA, in her official capacity as Administrator of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Joseph D. Gilberti Jr. v. Center Disease Control CDC et al
as 2:2020cv08251
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Hillsborough County State Attorneys Office, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Gilberti, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of California et al v. Council on Environmental Quality et al
as 3:2020cv06057
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Mary Neumayr and Council on Environmental Quality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 20-16606
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF OHIO and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL SACKETT, Proposed Defendant-Intervenors and CHANTELL SACKETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
