Cases 61 - 70 of 3,628
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
Danny Hirschfield v. United States Attorney's Office for the District, et al
as 24-5008
Plaintiff:
Danny Joe Hirschfield, Lord
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia and Superior Court for the District of Columbia, Criminal Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
LYLE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
EDWARD W. LYLE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Other:
Brad Greenspan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
N. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
L. N., Jessica North Macie and Jani North Saale
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
FISCHER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
ALAN E. FISCHER and JOHN DOES 1-10,000
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, US CAPITOL POLICE DEPARTMENT, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
GRIFFIN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
MARK GRIFFIN
Defendant:
PAMELA SMITH, JOHN DOE and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
BRAXTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
