Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Dobbs v. Byrd
as 4:2008cv00054
Plaintiff:
Dennis Dobbs
Defendant:
Raymond Byrd, Raymond Byrd, State of Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dobbs (DO NOT FILE) v. Epps et al
as 1:2007cv00323
Petitioner:
Dennis Dobbs (DO NOT FILE)
Respondent:
Christopher B. Epps, Raymond Byrd and James M. Hood, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dobbs v. Delta Correctional Facility et al.
as 4:2007cv00191
Plaintiff:
Dennis Dobbs
Defendant:
Delta Correctional Facility, Delta Correctional Facility, Raymond Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dobbs v. Canteen Catering Service et al
as 4:2007cv00190
Plaintiff:
Dennis Dobbs
Defendant:
Canteen Catering Service, John A. Wilson and Raymond Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dobbs (DO NOT FILE) v. Epps et al
as 1:2007cv00097
Petitioner:
Dennis Dobbs (DO NOT FILE)
Respondent:
Christopher B. Epps and James M. Hood, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dobbs (DO NOT FILE) v. Epps et al
as 1:2007cv00049
Petitioner:
Dennis Dobbs (DO NOT FILE)
Respondent:
Christopher B. Epps, Christopher B. Epps, James M. Hood, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dobbs (DO NOT FILE) v. Epps et al
as 1:2007cv00048
Petitioner:
Dennis Dobbs (DO NOT FILE)
Respondent:
Christopher B. Epps and James M. Hood, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams, et al v. A.P. Green Ind., et al
as 1:2001cv00213
Plaintiff:
Harry Cecil Burris, Charles Edward Bourn, Donell Smith and others
Defendant:
United States Mineral Products Co., Beazer East, Inc., Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
