Cases 1 - 9 of 9
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruner v. DOC Doctors and Nurses
as 5:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jermane Bruner
Defendant:
DOC Doctors and Nurses
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Crow et al
as 5:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Antoine Davis
Defendant:
Director DOC Scott Crow, GEO Group Inc, Amber Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Oklahoma DOC et al
as 4:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Noel King, Sonny Moore, Reginald Anderson and others
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma DOC, Derrick Yazel, Jason Lemons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv01067
Plaintiff:
David Brian Morgan
Defendant:
United States of America, Kevin Stitt, Director DOC Scott Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv00268
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy Anderson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Short, Odaunukwe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cone, Jr. v. Pearson et al
as 6:2014cv00410
Plaintiff:
John Eldridge Cone, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles Pearson, James Broadrick and DOC Population
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. IHCC, et al.,
as 6:2011cv00342
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gray
Defendant:
IHCC D&E Unit 1 Doc and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Locke v. Medical Director of Correctional Health DOC et al
as 6:2011cv00040
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Locke
Defendant:
Medical Director of Correctional Health DOC, Carter, Medical Director W.P. Clements Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
