Cases 101 - 110 of 137
Stephens v. Jones, et al
as 11-6284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MARK STEPHENS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director, DOC, GENESE MCCOY, Medical Services Administrator, DONNA LAYMON, Warden and others
Church v. Oklahoma Corr. Industries, et al
as 11-6272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM L.A. CHURCH
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES, OKLAHOMA CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES SERVICES, CELL FOR and others
Farris v. Jones, et al
as 11-6260
Petitioner - Appellant:
TYRONE L FARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Gray v. IHCC, et al.,
as 6:2011cv00342
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gray
Defendant:
IHCC D&E Unit 1 Doc and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainey v. DOC
as 1:2011cv02518
Plaintiff:
John Rainey
Defendant:
DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dopp v. Jones, et al
as 11-6207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LYNN DOPP
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, JOHNNY BLEVINS, IA Administrator, RANDY KNIGHT, IA Officer and others
Pemberton v. Jones, et al
as 11-6138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CURTIS PEMBERTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, JAMES RUDEK, Warden, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Locke v. Medical Director of Correctional Health DOC et al
as 6:2011cv00040
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Locke
Defendant:
Medical Director of Correctional Health DOC, Carter, Medical Director W.P. Clements Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Jone
as 11-7000
Petitioner - Appellee:
JAMES EDWARD CLAYTON
Respondent - Appellant:
JUSTIN JONES, DOC Director
Burnett v. Jones, et al
as 10-6285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN CRAIG BURNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBBIE MORTON, Administrative Review Authority, JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, JOSEPH TAYLOR, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
