Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6381
Petitioner:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of VA DOC
Donald Vaughan v. Burnice Mace
as 24-6317
Plaintiff:
DONALD DOC VAUGHAN
Defendant:
BURNICE MACE, RN, BSN, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, in whole capacity, CORIZON HEALTH and others
Donald Vaughan v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6290
Petitioner:
DONALD DOC VAUGHAN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6229
Petitioner:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of VA DOC
Michael Collins v. J. Oats
as 24-6126
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LASHARN COLLINS
Defendant:
J. D. OATS, Assistant Warden, C. WASHINGTON, Inmate Program Manager and BERNARD MORRIS, Religious Advisor to the Faith Review Committee for Virginia DOC
Donald Vaughan v. Brandon Renner
as 23-7287
Plaintiff:
DONALD DOC VAUGHAN
Defendant:
BRANDON RENNER, ANTHONY HUTZLER and R. STRAWDERMAN
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Washava Moye
as 23-2289
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHAVA MOYE, officially as Interim Director of Alvin S. Glen Detention Center ("ASGDC") for injunctive relief and declaratory relief, and individually for damages, SPECIFIC EMPLOYEES OF ASGDC, who negligently and/or intentionally injured plaintiff, individually for damages, RICHLAND COUNTY, ("RC"), SC, for damages and others
David Meyers v. Warden
as 23-7121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, of Red Onion State Prison, HAROLD W. CLARKE, VA DOC Director and KYLE ROSCH, VADOC Interstate Compact Administrator
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, VA D.O.C. Director, RANDALL C. MATHENA, VA D.O.C. Security Operations Manager, H. SCOTT RICHESON, Deputy Dir., VA D.O.C. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
