Cases 11 - 20 of 137
Arthur Sanford v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6964
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE SANFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir.; Virginia DOC, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia DOC and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia DOC
Robert Via, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6732
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT KING VIA, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA-DOC
Larry Williams v. Warden Kelly
as 23-6416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN KELLY, JAMES SAVGE, DOC DEEZIEN and others
Jonah Sovereign v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONAH JERVAIS SOVEREIGN
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Trustee / Director of DOC / Principal, TONY M. DARDEN, Ancillary Receiver / Agent / Warden, KEVIN MCCOY, Ancillary Receiver / Agent / Warden and others
US v. Hubert Downer
as 22-7243
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HUBERT DOWNER, a/k/a Doc
Donald Doc Vaughan v. Dept. of Public Safety and Correctional Services
as 22-7028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD VAUGHN and DONALD VAUGHN, a/k/a Donald Doc Vaughan
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RCI, ANTHONY HUTZLER, CO II and others
US v. Antonio Simmons
as 22-4123
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO SIMMONS, a/k/a Murdock, a/k/a Doc
Joe Baltas v. Rollin Cook
as 22-6139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE BALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROLLIN COOK, In His Individual and Official Capacities -a Connecticut DOC employee
Khalil Kimbrough v. Kevin Hudson
as 21-7713
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KHALIL J. KIMBROUGH
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN HUDSON, Superintendent, HAROLD CLARKE, Director of DOC, NURSE MEADE, Director of the Medical Staff and others
Jack Vigue v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6907
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD H. PENCE, Counselor, MAILROOM SUPERVISOR, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK RAY VIGUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
