Cases 41 - 50 of 137
Ryricka Custis v. Earl Barksdale
as 18-6308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYRICKA NIKITA CUSTIS
Defendant - Appellee:
EARL BARKSDALE, Warden Red Onion State Prison, M. YOUNCE, A Building Unit Manager Red Onion State Prison, I. EDWARDS, Records Department Red Onion State Prison and others
Defendant:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VA DOC and H. SMITH, Doctor Red Onion State Prison
US v. Spencer Bowens
as 17-7589
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SPENCER BOWENS, a/k/a Scooter, a/k/a Clyde, a/k/a Melvin McCurdy, a/k/a Doc Johnson
Stephen Blanton v. Harold Clarke
as 17-7554
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEPHEN BLANTON
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of DOC
Silvester Thomas v. Harold Clarke
as 17-7415
Petitioner - Appellant:
SILVESTER ALLEN THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the DOC
Travis Cherry v. Terry Glenn
as 17-7381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS LAVON CHERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY GLENN, Interstate Compact Coordinator, KEITH DORKINS, Head of Classification and HAROLD CLARKE, Director of DOC
Cyntez Jamar Fitzgerald v. Harold Clarke
as 17-7324
Petitioner - Appellant:
CYNTEZ JAMAR FITZGERALD
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of DOC
Lamont Dorsey v. Jeffery Kiser
as 17-6700
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAMONT DORSEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFERY B. KISER, VA DOC Department
Joshua Blair v. Virginia DOC
as 17-6682
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSHUA D. BLAIR
Respondent - Appellee:
VIRGINIA DOC
Wilbert Gilchrist v. Dr. Lard
as 17-6585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILBERT GILCHRIST
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. LARD
Defendant:
UNKNOWN, WENDALL PIXLEY, Warden, sued individually and in official capacity, INDER JEET SINGH GUJRAL, Dr., sued individually and in official capacity and others
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. S.L. Messer
as 17-6360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
S. MESSER, M. COUNTS, Inmate Hearing Officer at ROSP, C. BISHOP, C/O at ROSP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
