Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Henry v. Paige et al
as 7:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Henry
Defendant:
Treandre D. Paige, VA DOC Department of Correction, Wallens Ridge State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
VA Doc Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawkins v. DOC Employee
as 3:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Corry A. Dawkins
Defendant:
DOC Employee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughan, Jr. v. L.E.G.
as 3:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr.
Defendant:
L.E.G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shearin v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Charles McCoy Shearin
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, VA Dept. of Corr., Administrative Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sacra v. Haga et al
as 7:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Sacra, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Austin H. Haga, Sgt. Marc E. I. Bilbrey, C/O Jeffrey S. Bemis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughan v. Lancaster County Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr.
Defendant:
Lancaster County Police Department, L. E. G. and Ursula E. March
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Mutawakkil v. Andrews et al
as 3:2021cv00387
Defendant:
Eracka Young, J. Andrews, B.O.P. Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Hanif K. Al-Mutawakkil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braxton v. Red Onion State Prisons Medical Department et al
as 7:2021cv00051
Defendant:
S. Fletcher, Regional Director, B. Witt and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Troy Braxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunley v. DOC
as 2:2021cv00057
Plaintiff:
Robert James Hunley
Defendant:
DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
