Cases 1 - 10 of 17
ARCHIE et al v. COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND et al
as 1:2021cv18334
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ARCHIE and TARA SIMMONS ARCHIE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND, OFFICER CORDOVA, OFFICER BERMUDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11915
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
O'TOOLE v. CHICK-FIL-A, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv16076
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, 31-40, JOHN DOES, 41-50, CHICK-FIL-A, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN O'TOOLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PICCIONI v. CHICK-FIL-A, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv16079
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 41-50, CHICK-FIL-A, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK PICCIONI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALA v. CHICK-FIL-A, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv16064
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, 1-10, JOHN DOES, 41-50, CHICK-FIL-A, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LEAH ALA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BOLLING v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2019cv18545
Defendant:
DR. MELISSA DETTORE, (FNU) W. GRAY, SERGEANT BRIAN PATOE and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN G. BOLLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SYKES et al v. JOHNS et al
as 1:2017cv07272
Defendant:
ANDREW B JOHNS , DAVID WEINSTEIN , CRAIG REINER and others
Plaintiff:
GERALD SYKES and MARGOT SYKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv02564
Plaintiff:
NIKE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2011cv03623
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE COUNTY OF ESSEX OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
