Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jama v. Ball et al
as 3:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
Hamza Mohammed Jama
Defendant:
(FNU) Ball, Christopher Randall, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Adan v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Halima Adan
Defendant:
City of Portland, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Opbroek v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00610
Plaintiff:
Meghan Opbroek
Defendant:
City of Portland, John Doe 1-2, Zachary Domka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Rite Aid Pharmacy
as 2:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
Richard Morris
Defendant:
Rite Aid Pharmacy and Does 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Elliott v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv00857
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Destiny Elliott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gayman v. City of Brookings et al
as 1:2020cv00440
Defendant:
Kelby Mccrae, Tobias Chittock, Ray Marrington and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Gayman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12201
Committe v. AACSB International et al
as 3:2020cv00372
Defendant:
Susan Capalbo, Board of Trustees of Oregon State University, AACSB International and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Committe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wilson v. Guardian Management, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00768
Defendant:
Does 1-2, Guardian Management, LLC and Kristine Herb
Plaintiff:
Randi Lee Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02070
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01638
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
