Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Holloway v. Shaw et al
as 3:2019cv00370
Defendant:
Warden Frank Shaw, John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jason Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renfroe v. Parker et al
as 3:2018cv00609
Defendant:
Robert Denver Parker and Does 1-100
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kay Renfroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Marion County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2018cv00117
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-100, Marion County, Mississippi, Laura Stogner and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boddie v. Nash et al
as 3:2018cv00390
Plaintiff:
Willie Boddie
Defendant:
Cheron Nash and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McDavid v. City of Flowood, Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00211
Plaintiff:
Kenara Vonzell McDavid
Defendant:
City of Flowood, Mississippi , Gary Rhodes , Richie McCluskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yelverton v. Walker et al
as 5:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
James Toxie Yelverton, III
Defendant:
Walker, Burke, M.D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yelverton v. Walker et al
as 1:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
James Toxie Yelverton, III
Defendant:
Walker, Burke, M.D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheldon Nathan v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 16-60768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELDON NATHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA (CCA) and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-100
Hernandez v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheldon Nathan v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 16-60314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELDON NATHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and JOHN & JANE DOES 1-100
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
