Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Shelly Ashton et al v. The J.M. Smucker Co. et al
as 4:2021cv00221
Plaintiff:
Frederick Tan, Shelly Ashton, Jay Schoener and others
Defendant:
Does 1 through 50, inclusive, The Folger Coffee Co. and The J.M. Smucker Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Moser v. The J. M. Smucker Company et al ***Do Not File in this Case - All filings should be made in 4:21-md-2984***
as 4:2021cv00223
Defendant:
The Folger Coffee Company, DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive and The J. M. Smucker Company
Plaintiff:
Ellen Moser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
In re: Folgers Coffee Marketing
as 4:2021md02984
Defendant:
The Folger Coffee Company, Does 1 through 50, inclusive, The J.M. Smucker Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Sharel Mawby, Rodger Smith, Frederick Tan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wallace et al v. Communications Unlimited, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00503
Plaintiff:
Michael Wallace , Christian Johnson and Jefferey Super
Defendant:
Communications Unlimited, Inc., C.U. Employment, Inc., Communications Unlimited of the South, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ocean SW, Inc. et al v. Canam Pet Treats, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00354
Plaintiff:
Ocean SW, Inc. and U.S. Pet Nutrition, LLC
Defendant:
CanAm Pet Treats Inc. and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive
Counter_claimant:
CanAm Pet Treats Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Ocean SW, Inc. and U.S. Pet Nutrition, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scherer et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 4:2014cv01484
Plaintiff:
Elaine Scherer and Neil Scherer
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schaffer et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 4:2014cv01483
Plaintiff:
Neil Schaffer and Jin Schaffer
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
