Civil Rights Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Conklin v. Reedy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01197
Plaintiff: Jason M Conklin
Defendant: Larry F. Reedy, III, John Does 1-25 and Jane Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00996
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Zito v. Gettle et al
as 1:2022cv00722
Plaintiff: Charles Zito
Defendant: Jennifer Gettle, Sean McCormack, Stefanie Flick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SMITH v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv05189
Plaintiff: THEO SMITH
Defendant: THOMAS LICIARDELLO , JEFFREY WALKER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINSLEY v. SCHUCK et al
as 2:2017cv05190
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS TINSLEY
Defendant: JAMES F. SCHUCK, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JANE/JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUFFY v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv03083
Plaintiff: MICHAEL TUFFY
Defendant: THOMAS LICIARDELLO , JEFFREY WALKER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TENAGLIA et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv00094
Plaintiff: DAVID TENAGLIA
Defendant: THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JEFFREY WALKER, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSTER v. THE COMMITTEE OF SEVENTY et al
as 2:2016cv03598
Plaintiff: JAMES FOSTER
Defendant: THE COMMITTEE OF SEVENTY, WHYY, NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUPREY v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2016cv01314
Plaintiff: ALEX DUPREY
Defendant: THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JEFFREY WALKER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSI v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2015cv06540
Plaintiff: CARMEN ROSSI
Defendant: BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, JEFREY WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?