Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Johanna McDonough v. Anoka County, et al
as 14-1754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Johanna Beth McDonough
Defendant - Appellee:
Anoka County, Benton County, City of Bloomington and others
Taylor v. City of Amboy et al
as 0:2014cv00722
Defendant:
City of Amboy, City of Bloomington, Blue Earth County and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Grant Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Myers v. Aitkin County et al
as 0:2014cv00473
Defendant:
Aitkin County , City of Baxter , Cass County and others
Plaintiff:
Misty Kay Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heglund et al v. Aitkin County et al
as 0:2014cv00296
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rae Heglund and Jamie Lee Heglund
Defendant:
Aitkin County , Aitkin, City of , Babbitt, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rollins, Summer v. Albert Lea, City of et al
as 0:2014cv00299
Plaintiff:
Summer Michelle Rollins
Defendant:
Albert Lea, City of , Anoka County , Anoka, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Brooklyn Park, City of et al
as 0:2014cv00253
Defendant:
Brooklyn Park, City of , Caledonia, City of , Goodview, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthya Lou Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Braham, City of et al
as 0:2014cv00226
Plaintiff:
Kirsten Hagen Kennedy
Defendant:
Braham, City of , Robert Knowles , Michael Campion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krekelberg v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2013cv03562
Plaintiff:
Amy Elizabeth Krekelberg
Defendant:
Anoka County, City of Anoka , City of Apple Valley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potocnik v. Carlson, et al
as 0:2013cv02093
Plaintiff:
Sheila Potocnik
Defendant:
Walter Carlson, Anoka, City of, Bloomington, City of and others
Loeffler v. Anoka, City of et al
as 0:2013cv02060
Plaintiff:
Jennie Marie Loeffler
Defendant:
Anoka, City of , Burnsville, City of , Dakota County and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
