Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rudy Avila v. Philips Respironics et al
as 2:2023cv01373
Plaintiff:
Rudy Avila
Defendant:
PHILIPS RESPIRONICS, RESPIRONICS, INC. and DOES 1-50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
LIANG v. YAN et al
as 2:2022cv01763
Plaintiff:
GUANJAN LIANG
Defendant:
LI MENG YAN and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EYAJAN v. UPMC FOR YOU et al
as 1:2019cv00280
Defendant:
UPMC HAMOT HOSPITAL, DR. CHANDLER CHRISTINE, UPMC EAST HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA M. EYAJAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUCAS v. KNORR-BREMSE AG et al
as 2:2018cv01089
Defendant:
WABTEC RAILWAY ELECTRONICS, FAIVELEY TRANSPORT NORTH AMERICA INC., NEW YORK AIR BRAKE LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN W LUCAS and JOHN W. LUCAS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
STEWART v. KNORR-BREMSE AG et al
as 2:2018cv01083
Defendant:
FAIVELEY TRANSPORT NORTH AMERICA INC., NEW YORK AIR BRAKE LLC, KNORR BRAKE COMPANY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SLOAN STEWART
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
IN RE: RAILWAY INDUSTRY EMPLOYEE NO-POACH ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2018mc00798
Defendant:
KNORR BRAKE COMPANY, FAIVELEY TRANSPORT NORTH AMERICA INC., WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE CO. and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY KERR, TIMOTHY BACCO, BRIAN LARA and others
In Re:
IN RE: RAILWAY INDUSTRY EMPLOYEE NO-POACH ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master:
DAVID B. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
HAINLEY v. BARNES AND NOBLE, INC. et al
as 5:2015cv05513
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE HAINLEY
Defendant:
BARNES AND NOBLE, INC. and DOES 1-50, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHADDA v. MAGADY et al
as 2:2011cv05339
Plaintiff:
SOLANGE CHADDA
Defendant:
TERRY MAGADY , TOM BLOCK , DOES 1-50, INCLUSIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BERG v. OBAMA et al
as 2:2008cv04083
Plaintiff:
PHILIP J. BERG
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
