Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Keenan Deal v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 26-2680
Plaintiff:
Keenan Deal
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Shawn Dace, Doug Burris and others
Straughter v. St. Louis City Justice Center et al
as 4:2026cv01321
Plaintiff:
Jay Straughter, Jr.
Defendant:
St. Louis City Justice Center, Cara Spencer, Doug Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raevon Parker v. Doug Burris, et al
as 26-1714
Plaintiff:
Raevon Terrell Parker
Defendant:
Doug Burris, Rodney W. Sippel, Audrey G. Fleissig and others
Jered Blair v. State of Missouri, et al
as 26-1296
Petitioner:
Jered Christopher Blair
Respondent:
State of Missouri and Doug Burris, Interim Commisioner of the City of St. Louis Department of Corrections
Spann et al v. St. Louis City Justice Center et al
as 4:2026cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Spann and Jay Straugher
Defendant:
St. Louis City Justice Center, Cara Spencer, Doug Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deal v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2025cv01770
Plaintiff:
Keenan Deal
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Shawn Dace, Doug Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair v. State of MO et al
as 4:2025cv00843
Petitioner:
Jered Christopher Blair
Respondent:
State of MO and Doug Burris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Burris
as 4:2025cv00814
Petitioner:
Anton D. Moore
Respondent:
Doug Burris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dwayne Harris v. Unknown Harris, et al
as 24-3292
Defendant:
C.O. Unknown Harris, C.O. Unknown Brown, Doug Burris and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Harris
Bradford v. Hayward et al
as 4:2024cv01293
Defendant:
Doug Burris, Charles McKnight, Nathaniel Hayward and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Antony Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
