Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sena v. Tatum et al
as 1:2017cv00890
Plaintiff:
Greg M. Sena
Defendant:
Drew D. Tatum, Donna J. Mowrer and Marna N. Pyle-Trammell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gadbury v. Riley et al
as 1:2016cv01387
Plaintiff:
Paul R. Gadbury
Defendant:
Lisa B. Riley, Drew Lnman and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Silva v. Board of County Commissioners for the County of Roosevelt et al
as 1:2015cv01046
Plaintiff:
Tanya Silva
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners for the County of Roosevelt, Roosevelt County Adult Detention Center, David Casinova and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adamo v. Romero et al
as 2:2015cv00971
Plaintiff:
Jeanna S. Adamo
Defendant:
Raymond L. Romero, Davis Rutherford Ruark, Drew Inman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Silva et al v. Bitsoih et al
as 1:2013cv00551
Plaintiff:
Patricia Silva , Carlo Villa and Gildardo Villa
Defendant:
Larry Bitsoih , Brandon Cordova , James Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Haynes Burns et al
as 2:2013cv00015
Defendant:
Kathleen M. Haynes Burns , Randal Burnett , Drew D. Tatum and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruiz-Marentes v. Montoya, et al,
as 1:2012cv01014
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ruiz-Marentes
Defendant:
Emily Montoya, Jorge Trujillo, Don Derrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brownell v. Montoya et al
as 1:2011cv00979
Plaintiff:
Johnathon Brownell
Defendant:
Emily Montoya, Theresa Martinez, Micheal Drew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hawks Holdings, LLC v. Drew Corp. et al
as 6:2009cv01052
Plaintiff:
Hawks Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Drew Corp. and Walter Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
