Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Maynard et al v. Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00623
Plaintiff:
Laura Maynard and Jonathan Roy
Defendant:
Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc., Jason Revels, Reinke Manufacturing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hazel v. Lappin et al
as 2:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Hazel
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Joe Driver, Jeff Boyles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Driver v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23409
Plaintiff:
Chantell Yvette Driver
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Driver v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23157
Plaintiff:
Christina Driver
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Driver et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv18418
Plaintiff:
Darla Driver and Randy E. Driver
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Driver et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv02433
Plaintiff:
Shaina Driver and Michael Driver
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ray v. Driver et al
as 2:2010cv00009
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Ray, II
Defendant:
Joe Driver, Harold Boyles and Michelle T. Fuseyamore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Husband v. Watts et al
as 2:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
Eunice Husband
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, K. M. White, Joe D. Driver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. United States of America, et al
as 5:2010cv00001
Plaintiff:
Terry Jones
Defendant:
United States of America and Joe Driver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jones v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2009cv01545
Plaintiff:
Terry Jones
Defendant:
United States of America and Joe Driver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
