Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Chinook USA, LLC v. Duck Commander, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01015
Plaintiff:
Chinook USA, LLC
Defendant:
Duck Commander, Inc., Dahlen Associates, Inc. , 3292 Brands, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. Agricultural Dept. et al
as 6:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Agricultural Dept., Dept. of Justice, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lewis v. Duck et al
as 6:2014cv00070
Plaintiff:
William Solomon Lewis
Defendant:
Duck and Griffith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hatch v. FBOP et al
as 6:2012cv00250
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Hatch
Defendant:
FBOP, Karen Bennett-Baker, R. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Terry et al v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
Artemis Terry and Ronnie Totten
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Richard B. Ives, M. Broughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiggins et al v. Daymar Colleges Group, LLC et al
as 5:2011cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wiggins , Jason West , Joseph McConnell and others
Defendant:
Daymar Colleges Group, LLC , Daymar Learning of Paducah, Inc , Daymar Learning of Ohio, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Antonelli v. Crow et al
as 6:2008cv00261
Petitioner:
Michael C. Antonelli
Respondent:
Brad Crow, Jeff Hammond, Warden Hogsten and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
United States of America v. Reed et al
as 0:2007cv00021
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Reed, April Pitts Johnson Reed and Duck Wilder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Pavlish et al v. Northup et al
as 3:2007cv00045
Plaintiff:
Patricia Pavlish, Patricia Pavlish, Ronald Magers and others
Defendant:
Foster Northup, Duck Down Farm, LLC and Duck Down Farm, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
