Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Gayle Isham v. Richard Linford, et al
as 19-16477
Defendant / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVIN and RICHARD LINFORD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAYLE ISHAM
Defendant:
R. ARANAS and T. MANALANG
Richard Walker v. Dwight Nevin
as 18-16240
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD ALLEN WALKER
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVIN
Robbins v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2018cv00698
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Jo Gentry, Dwight Nevin and others
Petitioner:
Darin Scott Robbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rider v. Tristan et al
as 2:2016cv02633
Defendant:
S Barrett, Mr Gordon, Mr Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Rider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Nevin
as 2:2015cv02245
Petitioner:
Dustin Anderson
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Dwight Nevin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Baker et al
as 3:2014cv00631
Defendant:
Renee Baker and Dwight Nevin
Plaintiff:
Anthony Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Onofre v. Nevin et al
as 2:2014cv01643
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Nevada and Dwight Nevin
Petitioner:
Alexandre Henrique Onofre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Barrett et al
as 2:2014cv00303
Defendant:
C. Ball, Barrett and Dwight Nevin
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Jones, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zaritsky v. Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv02084
Defendant:
Greg Cox, Department of Corrections, Troy Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Gene Allen Zaritsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv01727
Plaintiff:
Antonio Davis
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections and Dwight Nevin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
