Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Boggis v. City of Moorhead et al
as 0:2022cv02576
Plaintiff:
Todd Boggis
Defendant:
City of Moorhead, Officer J. Hanson, Officer T. Hennen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibbs et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02040
Plaintiff:
Richard Beagles, James Smith, Ozzie Jenkins and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Doe v. Mower County Sheriff Office et al
as 0:2019cv01294
Defendant:
Dave Dyke, Jim Lamecker, Ryan Leif and others
Plaintiff:
John-Henry Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Integrated Process Solutions, Inc. v. Lanix LLC et al
as 0:2019cv00567
Defendant:
Dylan Dyke, Lanix LLC and Kevin Landsverk
Plaintiff:
Integrated Process Solutions, Inc.
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. Danneman et al
as 0:2017cv04070
Plaintiff:
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company
Defendant:
Jamie Lee Danneman, Jamie Van Dyke, Stephen Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Danneman v. Van Dyke et al
as 0:2017cv03654
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Danneman
Defendant:
Jamie Van Dyke , Stephen Van Dyke , Norman Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dyke v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc.
as 0:2015cv02364
Plaintiff:
Larry Van Dyke
Defendant:
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
S.D.H. et al v. CAM Transportation Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv01772
Plaintiff:
S.D.H. and Daniell Dykes
Defendant:
CAM Transportation Inc. and Craig Peter Grev
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Dykes v. Medtronic USA, Inc. et al
as 0:2007cv02777
Plaintiff:
Elaine Dykes
Defendant:
Medtronic USA, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
MCAC Properties, Inc. v. Dyke et al
as 0:2007cv00105
Plaintiff:
MCAC Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Allen Dyke and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
