Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Washington v. Salamon et al
as 4:2021cv01746
Plaintiff:
Jerome Junior Washington
Defendant:
Superintendent Salamon, J. Rivello, Major H. Haldeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DYKES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv04245
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH DYKES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Saleem v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2021cv01413
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sohail Saleem
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections, C.O. 1 Bickle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stockton v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv02228
Defendant:
Larcass, Neyman, Knowles and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DYKES et al v. TRI-STATE VALET, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01420
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M. DYKES and GINO BOSETTI
Defendant:
TRI-STATE VALET, INC. , WILLIAM PENN PARKING, INC. and ROBERT GIGLIOTTI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stockton v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John Wetzel, Dorina Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAYLESS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2013cv05076
Plaintiff:
MARTIN BAYLESS , JAMES DEARTH , KEILEN DYKES and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DYKES et al v. CHAMPION POWER EQUIPMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv03471
Plaintiff:
LATINIA DYKES and EUGENE DYKES
Defendant:
CHAMPION POWER EQUIPMENT, INC. and COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
