Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dahl v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00768
Plaintiff:
Lorna Dahl
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation and MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR US SALES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dahl v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00725
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Larry Dahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dahl v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 1:2016cv10725
Plaintiff:
Stephanie L. Dahl
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MOSLEY,ET AL. V FANDUEL, INC., ET AL.
as 1:2016cv10272
Defendant:
DraftKings Inc., FanDuel Inc. and FANDUEL DEPOSITS, LLC
Plaintiff:
DANNY DAHL and TONY MOSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dahl et al v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2015cv12276
Plaintiff:
Allison Dahl and Jacob Scott
Defendant:
Vermont Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dahl v. Harvard Management Company Section 457(B) Deferred Compensation Plan et al
as 1:2014cv13418
Plaintiff:
Eric Dahl
Defendant:
Harvard Management Company Section 457(B) Deferred Compensation Plan and Michael J. Tufts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Dahl v. Gelb
as 1:2012cv10582
Petitioner:
Kevin Dahl
Respondent:
Bruce Gelb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dahl et al v. Bain Capital Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv10254
Plaintiff:
Kirk Dahl, Helmut Goeppinger and Joel Gerber
Defendant:
Bain Capital Partners, LLC, The Blackstone Group, L.P., The Carlyle Group and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
GROSS v. DAHL-CHASE PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES DAHL-CHASE DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE HEALTH PLAN et al
as 1:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
LUCY GROSS
Defendant:
DAHL-CHASE PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES DAHL-CHASE DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE HEALTH PLAN and MERITAIN HEALTH INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
