Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Dailey v. Lake et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00206
Plaintiff: Tommy Aurthor Dailey
Defendant: Penny Lake, Jeffrey Kroemer, Noa Woolweever and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dailey v. Quiroga et al
as 1:2023cv00189
Plaintiff: Tommy Aurthor Dailey
Defendant: Tanisha Quiroga, Toney Malloris, Tommy Wacasey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carruthers v. Elkhart County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00803
Plaintiff: Antwan M Carruthers, Eye Keyla M Carruthers Washington and Antwan M Carruthers Washington
Defendant: Elkhart County Jail, ECCC, Danley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAILEY v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01842
Plaintiff: STEPHANIE DAILEY
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DAILEY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv01349
Defendant: COOK MEDICAL INC, et al
Plaintiff: JAMES DAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
DAILEY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03745
Plaintiff: MCKINLEY DAILEY
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAILEY v. VINCENT et al
as 1:2019cv03421
Defendant: BUTTS, VINCENT and J. FRENCH
Plaintiff: TOMMY A. DAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAILEY v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv01798
Plaintiff: KRISTI M. DAILEY
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DAILEY v. PHLLIPS et al
as 4:2019cv00067
Petitioner: SHANNON DAILEY
Respondent: NORM W. PHLLIPS and JACKSON COUNTY PROBATION DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAILEY v. NOBBLIT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00068
Defendant: MIKE FEECE, JUSTIN NOBBLIT, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and others
Plaintiff: SHANNON DAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?