Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Torres v. Cahill
as 14-1738
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Torres
Defendant - Appellee:
Jason Cahill, Individual Capacity, John Daire, AKA John Daire, John Correia, AKA John Correia and others
Dupas v. Daire et al
as 3:2014cv00322
Plaintiff:
DeanEric Dupas
Defendant:
Daire, John Doe, Mark Frayne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arzuaga v. Faucher
as 13-4589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jose Arzuaga
Defendant - Appellee:
Steven Faucher, Individual Capacity, Edward Maldonado, Individual and Official Capacity, Don Cyr, Individual Capacity and others
Torres v. Cahill
as 13-4058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Torres
Defendant - Appellee:
Jason Cahill, Individual Capacity, Edward Maldonado, Individual Capacity, John Daire, AKA John Daire and others
Selene RMFO REO Acquisition, LLC v. Gill et al
as 2:2013cv05067
Defendant:
Does 1 to 10, Inclusive, Desiree A. Gill, Edmound Daire and others
Plaintiff:
Selene RMFO REO Acquisition, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Taylor v. Pfister et al
as 1:2013cv01222
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
John Barkel, . Millsap, . Dair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddick v. Correction et al
as 3:2013cv00656
Plaintiff:
Jerome Riddick
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Maldonaldo, Brighthaupt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Selene RMFO REO Acquistion LLC v. Desiree A Gill et al
as 2:2013cv03007
Defendant:
Does 1 to 10 Inclusive, Edmound Daire, Desiree A Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Selene RMFO REO Acquistion LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Selene RMFO REO Acquisition LLC v. Desiree A Gill et al
as 2:2013cv02127
Defendant:
Edmound Daire, Does, Ed Duray and others
Plaintiff:
Selene RMFO REO Acquisition LLC
Arzuaga v. Pafumi et al
as 3:2013cv00340
Plaintiff:
Jose Arzuaga
Defendant:
Michael Pafumi, Rohan Daire, James Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
