Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Cornel Jackson v. County of Madera, et al
as 22-16920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MADERA, a Municipality of the State of California, BRETT FRAZIER, DAVID ROGERS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Martin v. Blea et al
as 1:2022cv00698
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrew Martin
Defendant:
Dale J. Blea, Ernest J. Licalsi, County of Madera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. County of Madera, et al.
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackson
Defendant:
County of Madera, Brett Frazier, David Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonilla v. Bender et al
as 4:2020cv07648
Defendant:
Dale J. Blea, Cara L. Ruiz, Joseph A. Soldani and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Bonilla v. David Rosenberg, et al
as 19-17334
Defendant / Appellee:
GRANT V. BARRETT, Judge, STEVEN ELLER, Judge, RENEE C. DAY, Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA
Arroyos v. Moreno et al
as 1:2019cv01576
Defendant:
Dale J. Blea, Jose Pantoja, Mitchell C. Rigby and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Arroyos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bonilla v. Rosenberg et al
as 2:2018cv02969
Defendant:
Steven Eller, Steven C. Bailey, Nathan G. Leedy and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla and Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Bonilla et al v. Bender et al
as 4:2018cv05745
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Respondent:
Thomas L. Bender, Joseph A. Soldani and Dale J. Blea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Bonilla et al v. Bender et al
as 1:2018cv01253
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Respondent:
Thomas L. Bender, Joseph A. Soldani and Dale J. Blea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
