Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Odom v. Beard et al
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Jessica Beard, Damon Preston and Mr. Kenny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Beard et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Jessica Beard, Damon Preston and Mr. Kenny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robbins et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Damone Robbins and Christina Robbins
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Auto and Home Services, LLC and Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Whitlock v. Shelby County et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Bobby Bard Whitlock, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County, Darrell Cox, Kim Damon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitlock v. Shelby County et al
as 3:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
Bobby Bard Whitlock, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County, Darrell Cox, Kim Damon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Akers
as 5:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Anu White
Defendant:
Daniel Akers and Damon Hininger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00190
Petitioner:
Damon S. Lewis and Damon Steven Lewis
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
Damon S. Lewis and D-Bo
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Napier v. Lasley et al
as 3:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Brian Eugene Napier
Defendant:
Damon Lasley and Eric Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fishback v. Wilson et al
as 3:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Brian Fishback
Defendant:
Mike Wilson, Robert Stivers, David W. Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
