Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Rod Runyon, et al
as 17-35207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROD RUNYON, Commission Chair of the Wasco County Board of Commissioners, STEVE KRAMER, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners, SCOTT HEGE, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, INC., COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER and OREGON PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Movant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION, THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Runyon et al
as 3:2017cv00038
Defendant:
Gorham Blaine, Bowen Blair, Angie Brewer and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Columbia Riverkeeper, Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. and Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility
Movant:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation and The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Erickson v. HSBC Mortgage Service Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00481
Plaintiff:
Dan Erickson
Defendant:
HSBC Mortgage Service Inc. and Caliber Home Loans Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 RESPA: Servicing of Mortgage Loans
Erickson v. HSBC Mortgage Services Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00482
Plaintiff:
Dan Erickson
Defendant:
HSBC Mortgage Services Inc. and Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605
Timothy Vint v. Element Payment Services Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00078
Plaintiff:
Timothy Vint
Defendant:
Element Payment Services Inc, Element Payment Services Inc, Element Payment Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
