Cases 41 - 50 of 223
Cropper v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv00969
Plaintiff:
Dwayne E. Cropper
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, James Scarbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akala v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv00957
Plaintiff:
John Akala
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Philip Morgan and Troy Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heath v. May et al
as 1:2012cv00846
Plaintiff:
Carla Heath
Defendant:
Robert May, Wendi Caple, Thomas Carrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Croll v. Fletcher et al
as 1:2012cv00805
Plaintiff:
Patrick Francis Croll
Defendant:
Kevin Fletcher, Jessica Barton, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Runyon v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 12-2606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. RUNYON
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of the Delaware Department of Corrections, PERRY PHELPS, DAVID PIERCE and others
Stones v. McDonald et al
as 1:2012cv00711
Plaintiff:
Dereck E. Stones
Defendant:
Lawrence McDonald, Correctional Medical Services Inc., Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Averill v. Celello et al
as 1:2012cv00599
Plaintiff:
Wayne R. Averill
Defendant:
Thomas F. Celello, Christina Jones, Robert Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00586
Petitioner:
James Arthur Biggins
Respondent:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Carl C. Danberg, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kostyshyn v. Morgan et al
as 1:2012cv00508
Petitioner:
Peter Kostyshyn
Respondent:
P. Morgan, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, J. Markell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHANNON JOHNSON, By and through Lakeisha Ford, Next Friend
as 1:2012cv00469
Petitioner:
Lakeisha Ford
Respondent:
Carl C. Danberg and Perry Phelps
Defendant:
Shannon M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
