Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Franquet v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2025cv00311
Plaintiff:
Julius C. Franquet, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello, III, Carol A. Moores, Michael A. Daye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter Sr v. Martuscello III
as 25-169
Petitioner:
DAVID CARTER
Respondent:
DANIEL F. MARTUSCELLO, III
Davis v. Martuscello et al
as 6:2025cv06024
Defendant:
Jeremy Pierce, Joseph Bishop, Thomas Delmar and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Shahid Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter Sr v. Martuscello III et al
as 1:2024cv09896
Defendant:
Leticia James, Daniel F. Martuscello III and Department of Law
Plaintiff:
David Earl Carter Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castaldo v. Martuscello III et al
as 6:2024cv06738
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CASTALDO
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello III, Darren Ayotte, Joseph Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moolenaar v. Katz et al
as 1:2024cv08636
Defendant:
Scott Bookstein, Kanella Grotgoupoulous, Malinda I. Katz and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Moolenaar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aitabdellah v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01238
Defendant:
John Doe and Daniel F. Martuscello, III
Plaintiff:
Salem Aitabdellah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Portillo v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2024cv01498
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Daniel F. Martuscello, III
Plaintiff:
Jaime Portillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DiBrango v. Doe et al
as 9:2024cv01452
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello, III, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. DiBrango
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aitabdellah v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv09222
Defendant:
John Doe and Daniel F. Martuscello, III
Plaintiff:
Salem Aitabdellah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
