Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Sankara v. Martuscello
as 1:2018cv06308
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Petitioner:
Ahmadou Sankara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sankara v. Martuscello
as 9:2018cv00699
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Petitioner:
Ahmadou Sankara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patel v. Martuscello
as 18-1317
Petitioner - Appellant:
Vinod Patel
Respondent - Appellee:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
O'Daniel v. Martuscello
as 18-894
Petitioner - Appellant:
William O'Daniel, 11-A-1440, Coxsackie Correctional Facility P.O. Box 999, Coxsackie, NY 12051
Respondent - Appellee:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as the Superintendent of the Coxsackie Correctional Facility, New York State Department of Correctional Services
Willock v. Martuscello
as 1:2017cv00454
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Petitioner:
Omar Willock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gough v. New York State et al
as 9:2016cv01107
Plaintiff:
Lamont Gough
Defendant:
New York State, Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr., Sergeant Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patel v. Martuscello
as 16-3020
Petitioner - Appellant:
Vinod Patel
Respondent - Appellee:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Lancaster v. Martuscello
as 9:2016cv00166
Petitioner:
William Lancaster
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sandy v. Martuscello
as 1:2016cv00421
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Petitioner:
Kester Andre Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sandy v. Martuscello
as 9:2015cv01501
Petitioner:
Kester Andre Sandy
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
