Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Ortiz v. Utah Board of Pardons et al
as 2:2023cv00753
Petitioner:
Daniel Ortiz
Respondent:
Utah Board of Pardons, Marc Miller and Utah Department of Corrections
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Utah Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortiz
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz-Medina v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv01455
Petitioner:
Daniel Ortiz-Medina
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ortiz-Medina v. Kizziah et al
as 6:2020cv00021
Defendant:
FNU Philip, Gregory Kizziah and USA
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortiz-Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
Ortiz-Medina v. Doe et al
as 5:2018cv00500
Defendant:
FNU Dunbar, John Doe, 2, FNU Rutherford and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortiz-Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz-Medina v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2018cv00433
Petitioner:
Daniel Ortiz-Medina
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ortiz-Medina v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2018cv00305
Petitioner:
Daniel Ortiz-Medina
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ortiz-Medina v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2018cv00637
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortiz-Medina
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz-Medina v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2018cv00201
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortiz-Medina
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ortiz v. Torgenson et al
as 2:2017cv00328
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortiz
Defendant:
Sarah Torgenson, FNU Cultur, Roger Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
