Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hargrove v. Labat et al
as 1:2022cv00932
Petitioner:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Respondent:
Sheriff Labat and Governor Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter et al v. Lablatt et al
as 1:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carter, Johnny Holloman, Jr., Kenton Robertson and others
Defendant:
Sheriff Lablat, Judge Wolf, Fani Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hargrove v. State of GA et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Petitioner:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Respondent:
State of GA and Sheriff Lablatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hargrove v. Lablatt et al
as 1:2022cv00219
Petitioner:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Respondent:
Sheriff Lablatt, Judge Oliver, Gov. Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hargrove v. Willis et al
as 1:2021cv05132
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Defendant:
Fani T. Willis, Sheriff Lablatt, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. Kemp et al
as 1:2021cv04487
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Defendant:
Governor Kemp, Judge Oliver, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. Atlanta Luxury Motorcars et al
as 1:2021cv04309
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Defendant:
Atlanta Luxury Motorcars and AtlantaLuxuryMotorcars.com/Marietta Ga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv04308
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Judge Oliver and Sheriff Labat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. Starrs Groc. et al
as 1:2020cv00516
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Defendant:
Stars Groc. and Sajida Parvez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hargrove v. Capela et al
as 1:2019cv00971
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Defendant:
Erika Shields and C. Capela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
